![]() Boy, I'll tell you, you're the best publicist in town.īECK: This is - America, this is a book that every house should have. It so discredits all of the scholars and it's amazing. Best - best book on faith and the founding I think I've ever read. Review of George Washington's Sacred Fire Wow - "all of the scholars" are wrong! With Fox News street cred like that, who could ask for anything more? Immanent Frame has more on this bizarre story here (the story notes a silver lining, which is the attention given to the excellent historian Thomas Kidd after his appearance to talk about George Whitefield and the Great Awakening). Lillback’s George Washington’s Sacred Fire, now a top seller on thanks to Glenn Beck’s promoting it, attempts to overturn wisdom conventional in scholarly circles that George Washington was a Deist, but rather argues Washington was an orthodox Trinitarian Christian. Lillback is President of Westminster Theological Seminary and a notable figure in the “Christian America” movement. That “the masses” are buying the book in great numbers is ironic. Most ordinary folks will not, like me, finish or even read a fraction of a 1200 page book with 200 pages of fineprint footnotes. No, this book aims squarely at respected scholars, notably experts on Washington's life, from Paul F. And Boller claims Washington some kind of "Deist," that evidence lacks for his Christian orthodoxy.īoller to James Flexner, who claim Washington was some kind of Deist.īoller's George Washington & Religion, among respected historians, is the generally accepted standard-bearer work of scholarship on the matter. Most "Christian America" scholars asserting Washington’s devout Christianity simply ignore such evidence, like for instance that Washington refused to take communion in his church such that his own minister termed him a "Deist" or "not a real Christian.” To his credit, Lillback is familiar with almost every claim Boller makes and seeks to answer them. ![]() Lillback does answer the claim that GW was a strict Deist, that is one who believes in a non-interventionist God and categorically rejects all written revelation. Though some notable scholars have so claimed, Boller did not.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |